Epidemic hemorrhagic fever (EHF) refers to a collection of severe febrile illnesses caused by various viral pathogens, including the Ebola virus, Marburg virus, Lassa fever virus, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus. These illnesses are characterized by a sudden onset of high fever, respiratory and digestive symptoms, and often progress to severe hemorrhagic manifestations.
Historical Context and Discovery: The first recognized outbreak of EHF occurred in 1967 in Marburg, Germany, when laboratory workers contracted the disease from African green monkeys imported from Uganda. This outbreak led to the identification of the Marburg virus, which is closely related to the Ebola virus. Subsequently, in 1976, simultaneous outbreaks of Ebola virus disease (EVD) occurred in Nzara, South Sudan, and Yambuku, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). These outbreaks marked the discovery of the Ebola virus and the naming of the disease.
Global Prevalence: EHF mainly occurs in tropical regions of Africa, but outbreaks have also been reported in other parts of the world. Ebola outbreaks have been limited to African countries, primarily in Central and West Africa. Marburg virus outbreaks have occurred in Africa, Europe (such as Serbia in 1996), and Uganda. Lassa fever is endemic in West Africa, particularly in Nigeria, while Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever is found in countries across Europe, Asia, and Africa.
Transmission Routes: EHF viruses are primarily transmitted to humans from animals through contact with infected blood or bodily fluids. The reservoirs for these viruses vary, including bats (as in the case of Ebola and Marburg viruses), rodents (Lassa fever virus), and ticks (Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus). Human-to-human transmission occurs through direct contact with the blood or bodily fluids of infected individuals, including during healthcare procedures without proper protective measures.
Affected Populations: EHFs can affect individuals of all age groups and occupational backgrounds. However, vulnerable populations may vary depending on the specific virus and geographical location of the outbreak. Due to their close and frequent contact with infected individuals, healthcare workers are at a higher risk of contracting EHF. Moreover, communities living in regions with limited healthcare infrastructure and poor infection control measures are more susceptible to outbreaks.
Key Statistics: The prevalence and impact of EHF vary depending on the specific virus. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), as of the end of 2020, there have been approximately 36,625 reported cases of Ebola virus disease, resulting in over 15,000 deaths. Marburg virus outbreaks have been less common, with sporadic cases reported. Lassa fever causes an estimated 100,000 to 300,000 infections annually in West Africa, resulting in 5,000 deaths. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever has been reported in over 30 countries, with an estimated mortality rate of up to 40%.
Major Risk Factors Associated with Transmission: Multiple risk factors contribute to the transmission of EHF, including:
1. Direct contact with the blood or bodily fluids of infected humans or animals. 2. Poor infection control practices in healthcare settings. 3. Handling or consumption of infected animal meat or carcasses. 4. Living in crowded conditions or densely populated areas conducive to person-to-person transmission. 5. Lack of adequate surveillance and response systems in regions with a high disease burden. 6. Insufficient resources and healthcare infrastructure, leading to limited access to proper prevention and treatment measures.
Impact on Different Regions and Populations: EHF outbreaks have a significant impact on affected regions, disrupting healthcare systems, straining limited resources, and causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Outbreaks also have social and economic consequences, including community breakdown, loss of livelihoods, and decreased investment in affected areas.
In terms of affected demographics, EHF outbreaks can impact various populations differently. Factors such as age, gender, occupation, and access to healthcare can influence vulnerability and the severity of infection. For example, pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to the Ebola virus, and healthcare workers are at a heightened risk due to their occupational exposure.
In conclusion, EHF represents a group of severe and potentially deadly viral diseases with significant morbidity and mortality rates. The global prevalence of EHF varies depending on the specific virus, with the primary pathogens being Ebola, Marburg, Lassa fever, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever. Transmission occurs through contact with infected animals or humans, with significant risk factors including poor infection control practices, inadequate healthcare infrastructure, and limited resources. EHF outbreaks have profound impacts on affected regions, leading to social, economic, and healthcare challenges.

Download Data(下载数据)

Seasonal Patterns: The data on epidemic hemorrhagic fever cases in mainland China demonstrates a consistent seasonal pattern over the years. In general, there is an increase in cases during the winter months and a comparatively low number of cases during the summer months. This consistent pattern is observed year after year.
Peak and Trough Periods: The peak period for epidemic hemorrhagic fever cases in mainland China is typically during the winter months, specifically in November, December, and January. These months consistently exhibit the highest number of cases throughout the years. Conversely, the trough period, with the lowest number of cases, occurs in the summer months, particularly in July and August.
Overall Trends: When examining the overall trends of epidemic hemorrhagic fever cases in mainland China, there appears to be an upward trend in the number of cases over time. The data displays a fluctuating pattern with occasional spikes in cases, but, overall, there is a long-term increase.
Discussion: The observed seasonal patterns in the data indicate that epidemic hemorrhagic fever in mainland China follows a predictable pattern, with higher transmission during the winter months and lower transmission during the summer months. Various factors, such as colder temperatures that enhance the survival and transmission of the virus, may contribute to this phenomenon.
The higher likelihood of transmission during the winter months, indicated by the peak period, may be a result of increased indoor gatherings and close contacts as people seek shelter from the cold weather. This trend may be influenced by factors like heightened crowding during holidays and seasonal travel patterns.
The overall increasing trend in the number of cases over the years raises concerns and suggests a worsening epidemic situation. This may be attributed to multiple factors, including changes in the virus itself, increased population density, and shifting environmental conditions. Further analysis and investigation are required to comprehensively understand the underlying factors driving this upward trend.
It is important to note that the data for January and February 2013, as well as some other months, include negative values for cases and deaths. These negative values may be the result of data reporting errors or anomalies and should be further investigated to ensure data accuracy.
Ultimately, the analysis of monthly data on epidemic hemorrhagic fever cases in mainland China underscores the presence of seasonal patterns, peak and trough periods, and an overall increasing trend in the number of cases. This information can inform public health practitioners and policymakers when devising and implementing effective control and prevention strategies.